Volume 37 Issue 6
Nov.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN Kaiwen, LAI Peng, ZHAO Kai, JIANG Yong. Statistical Modeling Research on the Magnetosheath Plasma Density[J]. Journal of Space Science, 2017, 37(6): 690-701. doi: 10.11728/cjss2017.06.690
Citation: CHEN Kaiwen, LAI Peng, ZHAO Kai, JIANG Yong. Statistical Modeling Research on the Magnetosheath Plasma Density[J]. Journal of Space Science, 2017, 37(6): 690-701. doi: 10.11728/cjss2017.06.690

Statistical Modeling Research on the Magnetosheath Plasma Density

doi: 10.11728/cjss2017.06.690
  • Received Date: 2016-11-30
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-06-20
  • Publish Date: 2017-11-15
  • By using the simulation data of the ideal MHD LFM model, the model of the mean plasma density of the magnetosheath from 03:00UT to 07:00UT on November 14, 2004 is established based on the Sliced Inverse Regression (SIR) and Local Polynomial Regression (LPR) method. The statistical relationship between the mean plasma density and the upstream solar wind parameters, the interplanetary magnetic field, and the geomagnetic disturbance indices are analyzed. The results show that the ionospheric disturbance intensity factor, the solar wind-magnetosphere coupling intensity factor, and the Sun-Earth coupling intensity factor are the three main factors which influence the plasma density of the magnetosheath. The up-flowing ions are the important source for magnetosphere circular current and magnetotail plasma during the recovery phase. The analyses show that, as modeling the process of space physics by the empirical regression method, the multi-collinearity problem usually leads to the poor accuracy of the model. However, the statistical models built by the non-parametric statistical method of SIP and LPR can efficiently solve the problems above.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    GLOECKLER G, IPAVICH F M, HAMILTON D C, et al. Solar wind carbon, nitrogen and oxygen abunda-nces measured in the Earth's magnetosheath with AMPTE/CCE[J]. Geophys. Res. Lett., 1986, 13(10):793-796
    [2]
    SIBECK D G, GOSLING J T. Magnetosheath density fluctuations and magnetopause motion[J]. J. Geophys. Res., 1996, 101(A1):31-40
    [3]
    PHAN T D, PASCHMANN G, BAUMJOHANN W, et al. The magnetosheath region adjacent to the dayside magnetopause:AMPTE/IRM observations[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 1994, 99(A1):121-141
    [4]
    SKJÆ ELAND Å, MOEN J, CARLSON H C. Which cusp upflow events can possibly turn into outflows[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 2014, 119(10):6876-6890
    [5]
    ARVELIUS S, YAMAUCHI M, NILSSON H, et al. Statistics of high-altitude and high-latitude O+ ion outflows observed by Cluster/CIS[J]. Ann. Geophys., 2005, 23(5):1909-1916
    [6]
    BURCHILL J K, KNUDSEN D J, CLEMMONS J H, et al. Thermal ion upflow in the cusp ionosphere and its dependence on soft electron energy flux[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 2010, 115(A5):A05206
    [7]
    REDMON R J, PETERSON W K, ANDERSSON L, et al. A global comparison of O+ upward flows at 850km and outflow rates at 6000km during nonstorm times[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 2012, 117(A4):A04213
    [8]
    LYON J G, FEDDER J A, MOBARRY C M. The Lyon-Fedder-Mobarry (LFM) global MHD magnetospheric si-mulation code[J]. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 2004, 66(15/16):1333-1350
    [9]
    FEDDER J A, LYON J G. The solar wind-magne-to-sphere-ionosphere current-voltage relationship[J]. Geophys. Res. Lett., 1987, 14(10):880-883
    [10]
    WANG W, WILTBERGER M, BURNS A G, et al. Initial results from the coupled magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere model:thermosphere-ionosphere respon-ses[J]. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 2004, 66(15/16):1425-1442
    [11]
    TOFFOLETTO F, SAZYKIN S, SPIRO R W, et al. Inner magnetospheric modeling with the rice convection mo-del[J]. Space Sci. Rev., 2003, 107(1/2):175-196
    [12]
    FU Suiyan, PU Zuyin, LIU Zhenxing. Numerical simulation of turbulent reconnection at the magnetopause[J]. Acta Geophys. Sin., 1994, 37(3):282-290(傅绥燕, 濮祖荫, 刘振兴. 地球磁层顶湍动重联的数值模拟[J]. 地球物理学报, 1994, 37(3):282-290)
    [13]
    UGAI M, WANG W B. Computer simulations on three-dimensional plasmoid dynamics by the spontaneous fast reconnection model[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 1998, 103(A3):4573-4585
    [14]
    WANG W, WILTBERGER M, BURNS A G, et al. Initial results from the coupled magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere model:thermosphere-ionosphere respon-ses[J]. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 2004, 66(15/16):1425-1442
    [15]
    SHUE J H, CHAO J K, FU H C, et al. A new functional form to study the solar wind control of the magnetopause size and shape[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 1997, 102(A5):9497-9511
    [16]
    LI K C. Sliced inverse regression for dimension reduction[J]. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1991, 86(414):316-328
    [17]
    NADARAYA E A. On estimating regression[J]. Theory Probab. Appl., 1964, 9(1):141-142
    [18]
    WATSON G S. Smooth regression analysis[J]. Sankhyā Ser. A, 1964, 26(4):359-372
    [19]
    FAN Jianqing, GASSER T, GIJBELS I, et al. Local polynomial regression:optimal kernels and asymptotic minimax efficiency[J]. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 1996, 49(1):79-99
    [20]
    KEMSLEY E K. Discriminant analysis of high-dimen-sional data:a comparison of principal components analysis and partial least squares data reduction methods[J]. Chem. Intell. Lab. Syst., 1996, 33(1):47-61
    [21]
    PI G, SHUE J H, PARK J S, et al.A comparison of the IMF structure and the magnetic field in the magnetosheath under the radial IMF conditions[J]. Adv. Space Res., 2015, 58(2):181-187
    [22]
    RAKHMANOVA L, RIAZANTSEVA M, ZASTENKER G. Correlation level between solar wind and magnetosheath plasma and magnetic field parameters[J]. Adv. Space Res., 2015, 58(2):157-165
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(818) PDF Downloads(721) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return