Volume 37 Issue 5
Sep.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Wei, WANG Ronglan, LIU Siqing, GONG Jiancun. Error Analysis of Typical Atmospheric Density Modelormalsize[J]. Journal of Space Science, 2017, 37(5): 538-546. doi: 10.11728/cjss2017.05.538
Citation: LIU Wei, WANG Ronglan, LIU Siqing, GONG Jiancun. Error Analysis of Typical Atmospheric Density Modelormalsize[J]. Journal of Space Science, 2017, 37(5): 538-546. doi: 10.11728/cjss2017.05.538

Error Analysis of Typical Atmospheric Density Modelormalsize

doi: 10.11728/cjss2017.05.538
  • Received Date: 2016-07-05
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-04-11
  • Publish Date: 2017-09-15
  • Based on the density data from May 15, 2001 to Dec. 31, 2008 derived from CHAMP accelerometer, the errors of JB2008 and MSISE00 model are analyzed. The results show that the two models both overestimate the atmospheric density, and the JB2008 model is better than the MSISE00 model (the average biases of JB2008 and MSISE00 are 2.2% and 17.6% respectively). Most relative error of JB2008 mode is from -20% to 20%, the proportion is as high as 89%. However, it is only 58% in the case of MSISE00. The two models have no obvious difference below the height of 450km, which is consistent with the conclusion of literature. Space environment is classified into four types, and the model characteristics of latitude and local time are analyzed for each kind of space environment. MSISE00 model has better local time characteristics while JB2008 has better latitude characteristics. The results are valuable for mastering the model error characteristics and improving the atmospheric density model.

     

  • loading
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (669) PDF downloads(911) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return