QX-1 GNOS M掩星数据质量分析
doi: 10.11728/cjss2024.03.2023-0071 cstr: 32142.14.cjss2024.03.2023-0071
-
刘智勇 男, 1982年出生于黑龙江省哈尔滨市, 现为武汉大学遥感信息工程学院在读博士研究生, 工程师, 主要从事资源与环境、遥感卫星图像智能处理等领域工作. E-mail: bear2001321@163.com -
刘森 1983年出生于河南省郑州市, 航天东方红卫星有限公司项目副经理, 高级工程师, 主要从事电子与微波类卫星总体设计、产品保证等领域工作. E-mail: HITUFO@foxmail.COM
作者简介:
通讯作者:
QX-1 GNOS M Radio Occultation Data Performance Analysis
-
摘要: QX-1 GNOS M是首台在轨实现北斗、GPS和Galileo三系统兼容的小型商业化全球导航卫星掩星探测仪. 2021年10月14日18:51 LT, 气象一号(QX-1)卫星发射并入轨. 自发射以来, 该卫星已收集大量观测数据. 基于QX-1 GNOS M的结构组成及性能, 统计分析了2022年8月17日全天的掩星事件及其全球分布情况. 通过将8月17日至9月3日的掩星数据与NCEP再分析模式对比, 评估QX-1掩星事件的探测穿透深度和折射率精度, 同时检验Galileo掩星数据的可靠性和一致性. 初步分析结果表明, QX-1 GNOS M在实现三系统兼容后, 掩星事件数量相较于仅使用GPS系统的情况增加了约1.5倍. 这一结果进一步证明, 不同全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)所提供的掩星数据在精度上具有一致性. 此外研究显示, 在多系统兼容的背景下, QX-1 GNOS M能够提供更为丰富和精确的气象数据.Abstract: QX-1 GNOS M is the first small commercial Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) occultation sounder to achieve on-orbit compatibility with BeiDou, GPS, and Galileo systems. On 14 October 2021, at 18:51 LT, the Meteorological Satellite-1 (QX-1) was launched and entered orbit. Since its launch, this satellite has collected a large amount of observational data. This paper provides a detailed introduction to the composition of QX-1 GNOS M and conducts a statistical analysis of the occultation events and their global distribution on 17 August 2022. By comparing the occultation data from 17 August to 3 September with the NCEP reanalysis model, the detection penetration depth and refractivity accuracy of QX-1 occultation events were evaluated, and the reliability and consistency of the Galileo occultation data were tested. Preliminary analysis results show that after achieving three-system compatibility, the number of occultation events detected by QX-1 GNOS M increased by approximately 1.5 times compared to using only the GPS system. This result further confirms that the occultation data provided by different GNSS systems are consistent in accuracy. Additionally, the study indicates that, in a multi-system compatibility context, QX-1 GNOS M can provide richer and more accurate meteorological and atmospheric data.
-
Key words:
- Radio occultation /
- GNOS /
- Miniaturization /
- Data quality
-
图 1 2022年8月17日QX-1 GNOS M/北斗/GPS/Galileo掩星事件全球分布情况
Figure 1. Distribution of the QX-1 GNSS M RO events for BDS, GPS and Galileo systems on 17 August 2022
图 2 2022年8月17日QX-1 GNOS M/北斗/GPS/Galileo掩星事件统计分析
Figure 2. Histogram of the QX-1 GNSS M RO events for BDS, GPS and Galileo systems on 17 August 2022
图 3 2022年8月17日至9月3日期间 QX-1 GNOS M/BDS/GPS/Galileo日掩星事件
Figure 3. RO events per day of QX-1 GNOS M/BDS/GPS/Galileo from 17 August to 3 September 2022
图 4 2022年8月17至9月3日QX-1 GNOS M/BDS/GPS/Galileo掩星事件全球分布及穿透深度
Figure 4. Distribution of RO events and their lowest penetration height of QX-1 GNOS M/BDS/GPS/Galileo occultation events from 17 August to 3 September on 2022
图 5 2022年8月17至9月3日QX-1 GNOS M/BDS/GPS/Galileo掩星折射率误差廓线
Figure 5. Statistical comparison among QX-1 GNOS M/BDS/GPS/Galileo RO refractivity profiles taking NCEP FNL reanalysis model as reference atmospheric data from 17 August to 3 September in 2022
-
[1] ROCKEN C, ANTHES R, EXNER M, et al. Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral atmosphere[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1997, 102(D25): 29849-29866 doi: 10.1029/97JD02400 [2] WICERT J, BEYERLE G, KONIG R, et al. GPS radio occultation with CHAMP and GRACE: A first look at a new and promising satellite configuration for global atmospheric sounding[J]. Annales Geophysicae: Atmospheres, Hydrospheres and Space Sciences, 2005, 23(3): 653-658 [3] 仇通胜. 基于北斗三号的无线电掩星接收机信号处理关键技术研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2021. DOI: 10.27562/d.cnki.gkyyz.2021.000015QIU Tongsheng. Study on Key Technique of Signal Processing for BDS-3 Based Radio Occultation Receiver[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021. DOI: 10.27562/d.cnki.gkyyz.2021.000015 [4] ANTHES R A, BERNHARDT P A, CHEN Y, et al. The COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 Mission: Early results[J]. Bulle tin of the American Meteorological Society, 2008, 89(3): 313-334 doi: 10.1175/BAMS-89-3-313 [5] KUO Y H, SCHREINER W S, WANG J, et al. Comparison of GPS radio occultation soundings with radiosondes[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(5). DOI: 10.1029/2004GL021443 [6] SCHREINER W S, WEISS J P, ANTHES R A, et al. COSMIC‐2 radio occultation constellation: first results[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2020, 47(4): e2019GL086841 doi: 10.1029/2019GL086841 [7] IURII C, IRINA Z, JOHN B, et al. Accuracy assessment of the quiet-time ionospheric F2 peak parameters as derived from COSMIC-2 multi-GNSS radio occultation measurements[J]. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 2021, 11 [8] LI Y, KIRCHENGAST G, SCHERLLIN-PIRSCHER B, et al. Dynamic statistical optimization of GNSS radio occultation bending angles: Advanced algorithm and performance analysis[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2015, 8(8): 3447-3465 doi: 10.5194/amt-8-3447-2015 [9] BAI W H, SUN Y Q, DU Q F, et al. An introduction to the FY3 GNOS instrument and mountain-top tests[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2014, 7(6): 1817-1823 doi: 10.5194/amt-7-1817-2014 [10] SUN Y Q, BAI W H, LIU C L, et al. The FengYun-3C radio occultation sounder GNOS: a review of the mission and its early results and science applications[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2018, 11(10): 5797-5811 doi: 10.5194/amt-11-5797-2018 [11] WEI J D, LI Y ZHANG K F, et al. An evaluation of Fengyun-3C radio occultation atmospheric profiles over 2015-2018[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(13): 2116 doi: 10.3390/rs12132116 [12] LIU Z Y, SUN Y Q, BAI W H, et al. Validation of preliminary results of thermal tropopause derived from FY-3C GNOS data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(9): 1139 doi: 10.3390/rs11091139 [13] 王树志, 朱光武, 白伟华, 等. 风云三号C星全球导航卫星掩星探测仪首次实现北斗掩星探测[J]. 物理学报, 2015, 64(8): 089301 doi: 10.7498/aps.64.089301WANG Shuzhi, ZHU Guangwu, BAI Weihua, et al. For the first time Fengyun-3C satellite-global navigation satellite system occultation sounder achieved spaceborne BeiDou system radio occultation[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(8): 089301 doi: 10.7498/aps.64.089301 [14] LIAO M, ZHANG P, YANG G L, et al. Preliminary validation of the refractivity from the new radio occultation sounder GNOS/FY-3C[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2016, 9(2): 781-792 doi: 10.5194/amt-9-781-2016 [15] 廖蜜, 张鹏, 刘健, 等. 风云卫星的掩星干大气温度廓线精准度特征[J]. 应用气象学报, 2023, 34(3): 270-281LIAO Mi, ZHANG Peng, LIU Jian, et al. Accuracy and stability of radio occultation dry temperature profiles from Fengyun satellite[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2023, 34(3): 270-281 [16] 刘艳, 孟祥广, 白伟华, 等. FY-3D卫星的北斗掩星分布特征与误差特性[J]. 空间科学学报, 2022, 42(3): 476-484 doi: 10.11728/cjss2022.03.210208019LIU Yan, MENG Xiangguang, BAI Weihua, et al. Analysis of Beidou Radio Occultation Data from FY-3D Satellite[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2022, 42(3): 476-484 doi: 10.11728/cjss2022.03.210208019 [17] HUANG F X, XIA J M, YIN C, et al. Assessment of FY-3E GNOS II GNSS-R global wind product[J]. IEEE Jour nal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2022, 15: 7899-7912. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3205331 [18] 杨光林, 孙越强, 白伟华, 等. 风云三号C星GNOS北斗掩星电离层探测初步结果[J]. 空间科学学报, 2019, 39(1): 36-45 doi: 10.11728/cjss2019.01.036YANG Guanglin, SUN Yueqiang, BAI Weihua, et al. Beidou navigation satellite system sounding of the ionosphere from FY-3C GNOS: preliminary results[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2019, 39(1): 36-45 doi: 10.11728/cjss2019.01.036 [19] DU Q F, SUN Y Q, BAI W H, et al. The on-orbit performance of FY-3D GNOS[C]//International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Yokohama: IEEE, 2019: 7669-7671 [20] ZHANG H, HUANGFU J, WANG X, et al. Comparative analysis of Binhu and Cosmic-2 radio occultation data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(19): 4958 doi: 10.3390/rs14194958 [21] BEYERLE G, SCHMIDT T, MICHALAK G, et al. GPS radio occultation with GRACE: Atmospheric profiling utilizing the zero difference technique[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(13): L13806 -
-
下载:
图(6)
计量
- 文章访问数: 422
- HTML全文浏览量: 148
- PDF下载量: 50
-
被引次数:
0(来源:Crossref)
0(来源:其他)
