Effects of Different Exercises during 90-Day Head-Down Tilt Bed Rest on Post-Bed Rest Walking Gait
-
摘要: 背景:头低卧床位是研究航天员模拟失重状态的常见方法,长期处于头低位卧床状态导致人体步态发生适应性改变,包括步态周期、关节角度和肌肉激活等方面,这些变化可能影响日常活动和任务执行的效率和稳定性。因此,需要优化目前的运动训练方案,以提高或维持航天员执行关键任务的能力,并延长任务的持续时间。目的:探究头低位卧床(HDBR)和不同运动方式干预对人体行走步态生物力学和下肢肌肉激活的影响。方法:36名受试者采用90天头低位卧床实验,随机分为5组,A组(对照组,8人,不做任何干预)、B组(7人,HDBR+有氧训练)、C组(7人,HDBR+高负荷抗阻训练)、D组(7人,HDBR+有氧训练+低负荷抗阻训练)、E组(7人,HDBR+有氧训练+高负荷抗阻训练),受试者于卧床前1天、起床后3天、起床后24天进行测试。通过步态分析和表面肌电分析评估不同组别受试者在各个时间段的步态、下肢关节生物力学和下肢肌肉激活情况。结果:1)测试时间显著影响单支撑期、双支撑期、摆动期、步频、髋关节最小值、髋关节最大值、膝关节最小值、膝关节最大值、膝关节角位移、踝关节最小值、踝关节最大值和下肢主要肌肉激活水平(P<0.05);2)组别显著影响单支撑期、双支撑期、步频、步长、步速、踝关节最小值、踝关节角位移、腓肠肌外侧激活水平、比目鱼肌激活水平(P<0.05)。结论:1)行走步态适应性改变表现为支撑期增加、摆动期减小和步频降低的运动控制策略变化。2)运动训练干预效果主要体现在改善踝关节的运动和增强小腿部分肌肉的激活水平,但对髋关节和膝关节的运动及大腿肌肉的激活水平的改善效果较差。在所有训练方案中,高负荷抗阻训练是维持并恢复下肢行走步态运动表现的重要手段,特别是将有氧训练与高负荷抗阻训练相结合的方式改善效果最好。3)恢复效果显示,下肢运动功能在BR+24天时仍未完全恢复,但踝关节运动表现的恢复速度要快于髋关节和膝关节。Abstract: Background: Head-down bed rest (HDBR) is a common method for simulating microgravity. Prolonged HDBR leads to adaptive changes in gait cycle, joint angle, and muscle activation. These changes may affect the efficiency and stability of daily activities and task execution. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize current exercise training protocols to maintain astronauts' ability to perform critical tasks and extend mission duration.
Objective: To investigate the effects of HDBR and different exercise training on walking gait biomechanics and lower limb muscle activation.
Methods: Thirty-six participants underwent a 90-day HDBR and were randomly divided into five groups: Group A (control group, 8 participants, no exercise training), Group B (7 participants, HDBR + aerobic training), Group C (7 participants, HDBR + high-load resistance training), Group D (7 participants, HDBR + aerobic training + low-load resistance training), and Group E (7 participants, HDBR + aerobic training + high-load resistance training). Gait and surface electromyography analysis were conducted 1 day before bed rest, 3 day after getting up, and 24 day after getting up.
Results: 1) Test time significantly affected single support phase, double support phase, swing phase, step rate, min and max hip angles, min and max knee angles, knee range of motion (ROM), min and max ankle angles, and activation of major lower limb muscles (P < 0.05). 2) Group significantly influenced stance phase, step rate, step length, walking speed, min ankle angle, ankle ROM, lateral gastrocnemius activation, and soleus activation (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: 1) Adaptive changes in walking gait were characterized by increased support phase, decreased swing phase, and reduced step rate, reflecting changes in motor control strategies. 2) Exercise training interventions primarily improved ankle motion and enhanced activation of calf muscles, but had limited effects on hip and knee motion as well as thigh muscle activation. Among all training protocols, high-load resistance training was crucial for maintaining and recovering lower limb walking gait, especially when combined with aerobic training. 3) Recovery effects indicated that lower limb motor control had not recovered to previous level in 24 day after getting up, but ankle recovered faster than hip and knee.
-
Key words:
- Simulated microgravity /
- bed rest /
- walking gait /
- joint angle /
- EMG
-
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 14
- HTML全文浏览量: 1
- PDF下载量: 0
-
被引次数:
0(来源:Crossref)
0(来源:其他)
下载: