留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于星载全极化SAR的极区电离层TEC 反演及极光活动的影响

李长浚,  邢赞扬,  王成,  于志同,  张清和,  王勇,  马羽璋,  赵凌新,  陆盛,  王翔宇,  赵变龙,  安家琛

李长浚, 邢赞扬, 王成, 于志同, 张清和, 王勇, 马羽璋, 赵凌新, 陆盛, 王翔宇, 赵变龙, 安家琛. 基于星载全极化SAR的极区电离层TEC 反演及极光活动的影响[J]. 空间科学学报. doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.05.2025-0244
引用本文: 李长浚, 邢赞扬, 王成, 于志同, 张清和, 王勇, 马羽璋, 赵凌新, 陆盛, 王翔宇, 赵变龙, 安家琛. 基于星载全极化SAR的极区电离层TEC 反演及极光活动的影响[J]. 空间科学学报. doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.05.2025-0244
LI Changjun, XING Zanyang, WANG Cheng, YU Zhitong, ZHANG Qinghe, WANG Yong, MA Yuzhang, ZHAO Lingxin, LU Sheng, WANG Xiangyu, ZHAO Bianlong, AN Jiachen. Polar Ionospheric TEC Inversion Based on Spaceborne Fully Polarimetric SAR and Its Response to Aurora (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(5): 1-14 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.05.2025-0244
Citation: LI Changjun, XING Zanyang, WANG Cheng, YU Zhitong, ZHANG Qinghe, WANG Yong, MA Yuzhang, ZHAO Lingxin, LU Sheng, WANG Xiangyu, ZHAO Bianlong, AN Jiachen. Polar Ionospheric TEC Inversion Based on Spaceborne Fully Polarimetric SAR and Its Response to Aurora (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(5): 1-14 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.05.2025-0244

基于星载全极化SAR的极区电离层TEC 反演及极光活动的影响

doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.05.2025-0244 cstr: 32142.14.cjss.2025-0244
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目(2024YFB3908002, 2025YFF0510702)和国家自然科学基金项目(42474219, 42120104003)共同资助
详细信息
    作者简介:
    • 李长浚 (第一作者) 男, 硕士研究生, 研究方向为基于SAR雷达的电离层扰动. E-mail: 202417818@mail.sdu.edu.cn
    通讯作者:
    • 邢赞扬 男, 博士, 副教授, 研究方向为极区电离层–磁层耦合和极光物理. E-mail: xingzanyang@sdu.edu.cn
  • 中图分类号: P352

Polar Ionospheric TEC Inversion Based on Spaceborne Fully Polarimetric SAR and Its Response to Aurora

  • 摘要: 极光活动可引起极区电离层总电子含量(TEC)增强, 并对星载全极化合成孔径雷达(SAR)L波段电磁波传播产生显著影响, 进而导致附加相位误差和极化失真. 基于32景全极化SAR影像数据, 采用4种典型法拉第旋转角(FRA)反演算法获取极区电离层TEC, 并与同期当地地基GNSS-TEC观测结果进行对比评估; 同时选取2景重访影像, 定量分析极光活动对SAR信号质量的影响. 结果表明, 4种算法中, B&B算法反演的TEC结果与观测值一致性最好; 极光弧引起的TEC增强可导致FRA显著增大, 并使交叉圆极化积减小, 表明SAR信号信噪比降低. 研究结果表明, 基于B&B算法的全极化SAR可较有效反演极区TEC, 可为极区电离层扰动监测及其与极光活动关系研究提供新的技术手段.

     

  • 图  1  2007年4月1日基于4种FRA反演算法的TEC结果

    Figure  1.  TEC map based on four FRA inversion methods on 1 April 2007

    图  2  2007年4月1日 THEMIS Gako台站ASI观测与SAR反演TEC的对比

    Figure  2.  Comparison between ASI observation and SAR inversion TEC at THEMIS Gako station on 1 April 2007

    图  3  2007年4月1日基于4种FRA反演算法的TEC (a)~(d)与GNSS-TEC (e)对比

    Figure  3.  Comparison of TEC maps based on four FRA inversion methods (a)~(d) with GNSS-TEC (e) on 1 April 2007

    图  4  极光活动时FRA与abs($ {\boldsymbol{Z}}_{12}\boldsymbol{Z}_{21}^{*} $)分布及其相关分析

    Figure  4.  Distribution and correlation analysis of FRA and abs($ {\boldsymbol{Z}}_{12}\boldsymbol{Z}_{21}^{*} $)during aurora activity

    图  5  无极光活动时FRA与abs($ {\mathbf{Z}}_{\mathbf{12}}\mathbf{Z}_{\mathbf{21}}^{\mathbf{*}} $)分布及其相关性分析

    Figure  5.  Distribution and correlation analysis of FRA and abs($ {\mathbf{Z}}_{\mathbf{12}}\mathbf{Z}_{\mathbf{21}}^{\mathbf{*}} $) without aurora activity

    表  1  2007年4月1日事件4种FRA反演算法计算的TEC与GNSS-TEC的统计结果

    Table  1.   Statistics of TEC calculated by four FRA inversion methods and GNSS-TEC for the event on 1 April 2007

    MethodB&BFreemanWangLiGNSS
    Max6.9742.336.508.008.65
    Min2.178.100.331.923.70
    Mean4.2212.834.014.115.31
    RMSE/TECU2.409.805.604.86-
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  有无极光活动下各区域FRA与交叉圆极化积的统计特征对比

    Table  2.   Comparison of statistical characteristics of FRA and Cross-Polarization product in different regions with and without aurora activity

    Item abs($ {Z}_{12}Z_{21}^{*} $)/ dB FRA/(°)
    Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4
    Min –8.642 –6.570 –6.173 –6.143 4.574 2.780 0.284 0.352
    Max –2.970 –1.541 –1.123 –0.082 5.439 3.332 0.893 0.787
    Mean –6.141 –4.443 –4.179 –4.209 5.068 3.014 0.585 0.556
    STD 1.566 0.822 0.799 0.764 0.127 0.057 0.065 0.060
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] WANG X Y, ZHANG Q H, WANG C, et al. Unusual shrinkage and reshaping of Earth’s magnetosphere under a strong northward interplanetary magnetic field[J]. Communications Earth & Environment, 2023, 4(1): 31 doi: 10.1038/s43247-023-00700-0
    [2] ZHAO B L, ZHANG J J, ZHANG Q H, et al. Simultaneous observation of duskside and dawnside subauroral polarization streams during an intense magnetic storm[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2025, 52(17): e2024GL114160 doi: 10.1029/2024GL114160
    [3] LU S, XING Z Y, ZHANG Q H, et al. Ionospheric scintillation and geomagnetic disturbance caused by space hurricanes[J]. Space Weather, 2025, 23(7): e2025SW004435 doi: 10.1029/2025SW004435
    [4] 王成. 电离层对星载SAR成像质量影响和校正方法研究[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2015

    WANG Cheng. Study of Ionospheric Effects and Correction Methods on Space-Borne SAR Imaging[D]. Xi’an: Xidian University, 2015
    [5] JI Y F, DONG Z, ZHANG Y S, et al. Equatorial ionospheric scintillation measurement in advanced land observing satellite phased array-type L-band synthetic aperture radar observations[J]. Engineering, 2025, 47: 70-85 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.01.027
    [6] HALLBERG B, SMITH G, OLOFSSON A, et al. Performance simulation of spaceborne P-band SAR for global biomass retrieval[C]//Proceedings of 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Anchorage: IEEE, 2004: 503-506
    [7] ABE T, OHKI M, TADONO T. Observation of huge iceberg detachment from Larsen-C ice shelf in Antarctic peninsula by ALOS-2/PALSAR-2[C]//Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Valencia: IEEE, 2018: 5172-5175
    [8] JI Y F, DONG Z, ZHANG Y S, et al. Transionospheric Synthetic Aperture Radar Observation: a comprehensive review[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2025, 13(2): 273-313 doi: 10.1109/MGRS.2024.3454635
    [9] PI X Q, FREEMAN A, CHAPMAN B, et al. Imaging ionospheric inhomogeneities using spaceborne synthetic aperture radar[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2011, 116(A4): A04303 doi: 10.1029/2010ja016267
    [10] WRIGHT P A, QUEGAN S, WHEADON N S, et al. Faraday rotation effects on L-band spaceborne SAR data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003, 41(12): 2735-2744 doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2003.815399
    [11] PI X Q. Ionospheric effects on spaceborne synthetic aperture radar and a new capability of imaging the ionosphere from space[J]. Space Weather, 2015, 13(11): 737-741 doi: 10.1002/2015SW001281
    [12] BICKEL S H, BATES R H T. Effects of magneto-ionic propagation on the polarization scattering matrix[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1965, 53(8): 1089-1091 doi: 10.1109/PROC.1965.4097
    [13] FREEMAN A. Calibration of linearly polarized polarimetric SAR data subject to Faraday rotation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2004, 42(8): 1617-1624 doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.830161
    [14] LI L, ZHANG Y S, YANG L, et al. Faraday rotation angle estimation from polarimetric covariance matrix[C]//Proceedings of the IET International Radar Conference 2013. Xi’an: IET, 2013: 174
    [15] WANG C, LIU L, CHEN L, et al. Improved TEC retrieval based on spaceborne PolSAR data[J]. Radio Science, 2017, 52(3): 288-304 doi: 10.1002/2016RS006116
    [16] 朱艺洵, 熊超, 王丰珏. 基于全极化SAR观测的TEC反演算法分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2024, 67(11): 4015-4029 doi: 10.6038/cjg2024S0071

    ZHU Yixun, XIONG Chao, WANG Fengjue. The analysis of TEC inversion algorithms based on full-polarization SAR observations[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2024, 67(11): 4015-4029 doi: 10.6038/cjg2024S0071
    [17] WANG C, GUO W L, ZHANG Q H, et al. 3-D computerized ionospheric tomography with GPS, SAR, and ionosonde[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: 5210109
    [18] WANG C, WANG L M, ZHAO H S, et al. Ionospheric electron density reconstruction based on space-borne SAR in Alaska regions[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2024, 21: 4011805 doi: 10.1109/lgrs.2024.3412799
    [19] WANG C, ZHAO H S, WANG L M, et al. GPS-based ionospheric tomography from the combination of PolSAR and E-CHAIM[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 5205714 doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2024.3367420
    [20] SATO H, KIM J S, OTSUKA Y, et al. L-band synthetic aperture radar observation of ionospheric density irregularities at equatorial plasma depletion region[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2021, 48(16): e2021GL093541 doi: 10.1029/2021GL093541
    [21] MOHANTY S, SINGH G, CARRANO C S, et al. Ionospheric scintillation observation using space‐borne synthetic aperture radar data[J]. Radio Science, 2018, 53(10): 1187-1202 doi: 10.1029/2017RS006424
    [22] WANG X, ZHANG Y H, LI D. Estimation of ionospheric Faraday rotation over ocean areas using L-band spaceborne PolSAR data[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2024, 45(9): 3054-3074 doi: 10.1080/01431161.2024.2339206
    [23] IWATA T, ISHIDA H, OSAWA Y, et al. Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS): development and on-orbit status[J]. The Journal of Space Technology and Science, 2007, 23(1): 1_1-1_13
    [24] RIDEOUT W, COSTER A. Automated GPS processing for global total electron content data[J]. GPS Solutions, 2006, 10(3): 219-228 doi: 10.1007/s10291-006-0029-5
    [25] APPLETON E V, BEYNON W J G. The application of ionospheric data to radio-communication problems: part I[J]. Proceedings of the Physical Society, 1940, 52(4): 518-533 doi: 10.1088/0959-5309/52/4/311
    [26] GUO W, CHEN J, YANG W, et al. Impact of vertical electron density distribution on ionospheric total electron content measurements based on spaceborne low-frequency SAR[C]//Proceedings of 2017 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Fort Worth: IEEE, 2017: 4421-4424
    [27] QUEGAN S. A unified algorithm for phase and cross-talk calibration of polarimetric data-theory and observations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1994, 32(1): 89-99 doi: 10.1109/36.285192
    [28] MEYER F J, NICOLL J B. Prediction, detection, and correction of faraday rotation in full-polarimetric L-band SAR data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2008, 46(10): 3076-3086 doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2003002
    [29] JI Y F, ZHANG Y S, ZHANG Q L, et al. Retrieval of ionospheric faraday rotation angle in low-frequency polarimetric SAR data[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 3181-3193 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2888928
    [30] ZHU Y X, XIONG C, JI Y F, et al. Influence of monoenergetic and broadband aurora on SAR imaging: a case study[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2025, 76(7): 3815-3829 doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2025.03.054
  • 加载中
图(5) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  992
  • HTML全文浏览量:  109
  • PDF下载量:  179
  • 被引次数: 

    0(来源:Crossref)

    0(来源:其他)

出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-12-22
  • 修回日期:  2026-06-16
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-03-26

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回