Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YIN Hanke, YUAN Jing, ZHAO Shufan, SHEN Xuhui, JIN Xiaoyuan, WANG Qiao, LIAO Li, YANG Dehe. A Robust and High-Speed Automated Detection Model for Lightning Whistler (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2025, 45(5): 1-14 doi: 10.11728/cjss2025.05.2024-0132
Citation: YIN Hanke, YUAN Jing, ZHAO Shufan, SHEN Xuhui, JIN Xiaoyuan, WANG Qiao, LIAO Li, YANG Dehe. A Robust and High-Speed Automated Detection Model for Lightning Whistler (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2025, 45(5): 1-14 doi: 10.11728/cjss2025.05.2024-0132

A Robust and High-Speed Automated Detection Model for Lightning Whistler

doi: 10.11728/cjss2025.05.2024-0132 cstr: 32142.14.cjss.2024-0132
  • Received Date: 2024-10-22
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-03-31
  • Available Online: 2025-03-31
  • The Zhangheng Satellite has accumulated a vast amount of observational data over its six years in orbit. Detecting all Lightning Whistler Wave (LW) events from this dataset is crucial for comprehensively analyzing the variation patterns of the space physical environment. However, using the current mainstream LW detection technology, which is based on time-frequency spectrograms, it would take approximately 40 years to complete this task. To address the slow inference speed and meet practical engineering demands, this study proposes, for the first time, a high-speed detection model for lightning whistler waves from the perspective of audio event detection—WhisNet. This model reduces the time cost from 40 years to just 54 days. First, waveform data is segmented using a 4-second sliding window; then, Mel-spectrogram audio features are extracted. Next, a lightweight Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network (CRNN) is constructed to further extract the audio event features of LW. Finally, two fully connected networks are created at the output layer to predict the start time and duration of each LW event. To evaluate the model’s performance and computational speed, experiments were conducted on data from the SCM (Search Coil Magnetometer) between April 1 and April 10, 2020. The results show that the performance of the WhisNet model is comparable to that of time-frequency image-based methods, but with a 99% reduction in computational and parameter costs and a 98% increase in computational speed. The model was further applied to SCM data from May 2020, and the detection results were statistically analyzed and visually compared to the average lightning density trend from the WWLLN Global Lightning Climatology and timeseries (WGLC) for May 2020. The high consistency between the two further confirms the applicability and accuracy of the WhisNet model in processing large-scale satellite data. This method offers significant reference value for thoroughly exploring other large-scale geospace events.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    STOREY L R O. An investigation of whistling atmospherics[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1953, 246(908): 113-141. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1953.0011
    [2]
    HELLIWELL R A. Whistlers and related ionospheric phenomena[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1966, 11(5): 563-564. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1966.tb03172.x
    [3]
    SMITH R L, HELLIWELL R A, YABROFF I W. A theory of trapping of whistlers in field-aligned columns of enhanced ionization[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1960, 65(3): 815-823. doi: 10.1029/JZ065i003p00815
    [4]
    EDGAR B C. The Structure of the Magnetosphere as Deduced from Magnetospherically Reflected Whistlers [R]. No. NSSDC-ID-66-049A-17-PM. Greenbelt, MD: NASA National Space Science Data Center, 1972.
    [5]
    Walker A D M. The theory of whistler propagation[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1976, 14(4): 629-638. doi: 10.1029/RG014i004p00629
    [6]
    TANG R X, YUAN A, LI H M, et al. Influence of solar wind dynamic pressure on distribution of whistler mode waves based on van Allen probe observations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2023, 128(4): e2022JA031181. doi: 10.1029/2022JA031181
    [7]
    WOODFIELD E E, GLAUERT S A, MENIETTI J D, et al. Rapid electron acceleration in low-density regions of Saturn's radiation belt by whistler mode chorus waves[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2019, 46(13): 7191-7198. doi: 10.1029/2019GL083071
    [8]
    WOODFIELD E E, GLAUERT S A, MENIETTI J D, et al. Acceleration of electrons by whistler-mode hiss waves at Saturn[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2022, 49(3): e2021GL096213. doi: 10.1029/2021GL096213
    [9]
    SANTOLÍK O, PARROT M, INAN U S, et al. Propagation of unducted whistlers from their source lightning: a case study[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2009, 114(A3): A03212. doi: 10.1029/2008JA013776
    [10]
    周怀北, 肖佐, 孙传礼. 根据哨声频谱反演云—地闪电参数[J]. 电波科学学报, 1989, 4(1): 1-7

    ZHOU Huaibei, XIAO Zuo, SUN Chuanli. A study of cloud-earth lightning parameters by using whistler spectrum[J]. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 1989, 4(1): 1-7
    [11]
    CHEN Y P, NI B B, GU X D, et al. First observations of low latitude whistlers using WHU ELF/VLF receiver system[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2017, 60(1): 166-174. doi: 10.1007/s11431-016-6103-5
    [12]
    CARPENTER D L, ANDERSON R R. An ISEE/whistler model of equatorial electron density in the magnetosphere[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 1992, 97(A2): 1097-1108. doi: 10.1029/91JA01548
    [13]
    SINGH A K, VERMA U P, BHARGAWA A. Remote sensing of mid/upper atmosphere using ELF/VLF waves[J]. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: A Physics and Space Science, 2018, 18(10): 11-21
    [14]
    OIKE Y, KASAHARA Y, GOTO Y. Spatial distribution and temporal variations of occurrence frequency of lightning whistlers observed by VLF/WBA onboard Akebono[J]. Radio Science, 2014, 49(9): 753-764. doi: 10.1002/2014RS005523
    [15]
    BAYUPATI I P A, KASAHARA Y, GOTO Y. Study of dispersion of lightning whistlers observed by Akebono satellite in the Earth’s plasmasphere[J]. IEICE Transactions on Communications, 2012, E95. B(11): 3472-3479. DOI: 10.1587/transcom.E95.B.3472
    [16]
    CLILVERD M A, NUNN D, LEV-TOV S J, et al. Determining the size of lightning-induced electron precipitation patches[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2002, 107(A8): SIA10. doi: 10.1029/2001JA000301
    [17]
    KISHORE A, DEO A, KUMAR S. Upper atmospheric remote sensing using ELF-VLF lightning generated tweek and whistler sferics[J]. The South Pacific Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences, 2016, 34(1): 12-20. doi: 10.1071/sp16002
    [18]
    PARROT M, PINÇON J L, SHKLYAR D. Short-fractional hop whistler rate observed by the low-altitude satellite DEMETER at the end of the solar cycle 23[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2019, 124(5): 3522-3531. doi: 10.1029/2018JA026176
    [19]
    HORNE R B, GLAUERT S A, MEREDITH N P, et al. Space weather impacts on satellites and forecasting the Earth's electron radiation belts with SPACECAST[J]. Space Weather, 2013, 11(4): 169-186. doi: 10.1002/swe.20023
    [20]
    LINZMAYER V, NĚMEC F, SANTOLÍK O, et al. Lightning-induced energetic electron precipitation observed in long-term DEMETER spacecraft measurements[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2024, 129(8): e2024JA032713 doi: 10.1029/2024JA032713
    [21]
    FEINLAND M, BLUM L W, MARSHALL R A, et al. Lightning-induced relativistic electron precipitation from the inner radiation belt[J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15(1): 8721. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53036-4
    [22]
    LICHTENBERGER J, FERENCZ C, BODNÁR L, et al. Automatic whistler detector and analyzer system: automatic whistler detector[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2008, 113(A12): A12201. doi: 10.1029/2008JA013467
    [23]
    STANFORD VLF GROUP. Automated Detection of Whistlers for the TARANIS Space[R]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 2009.
    [24]
    DHARMA K S, BAYUPATI I P A, BUANA P W. Automatic lightning whistler detection using connected component labeling method[J]. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 2014, 66(2): 638-645.
    [25]
    KONAN O J E Y, MISHRA A K, LOTZ S. Machine learning techniques to detect and characterise whistler radio waves[OL]. arXiv: 2002.01244. (2020-02-04) [2023-10-15]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01244. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2002.01244.
    [26]
    袁静, 王桥, 杨德贺, 等. 张衡一号感应磁力仪数据闪电哨声波自动识别[J]. 地球物理学报, 2021, 64(11): 3905-3924 doi: 10.6038/cjg2021O0164

    YUAN Jing, WANG Qiao, YANG Dehe, et al. Automatic recognition algorithm of lightning whistlers observed by the Search Coil Magnetometer onboard the Zhangheng-1 Satellite[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2021, 64(11): 3905-3924 doi: 10.6038/cjg2021O0164
    [27]
    PATAKI B Á, LICHTENBERGER J, CLILVERD M, et al. Monitoring space weather: using automated, accurate neural network based whistler segmentation for whistler inversion[J]. Space Weather, 2022, 20(2): e2021SW002981. doi: 10.1029/2021SW002981
    [28]
    HARID V, LIU C, PANG Y, et al. Automated large-scale extraction of whistlers using mask-scoring regional convolutional neural network[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2021, 48(15): e2021GL093819. doi: 10.1029/2021GL093819
    [29]
    路超, 泽仁志玛, 杨德贺, 等. 改进YOLOv5的闪电哨声波轻量化自动检测模型[J]. 空间科学学报, 2024, 44(3): 458-473

    LU Chao, ZEREN Zhima, YANG Dehe, et al. Lightweight Automatic Detection Model for Lightning Whistle Waves Based on Improved YOLOv5. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2024, 44(3): 458-473
    [30]
    袁静, 王子杰, 泽仁志玛, 等. 基于智能语音技术的闪电哨声波自动识别[J]. 地球物理学报, 2022, 65(3): 882-897 doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0365

    YUAN Jing, WANG Zijie, ZEREN Zhima, et al. Automatic recognition algorithm of the lightning whistler waves by using speech processing technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2022, 65(3): 882-897 doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0365
    [31]
    ZEREN Z M, HU Y P, PIERSANTI M, et al. The seismic electromagnetic emissions during the 2010 Mw 7.8 Northern Sumatra Earthquake revealed by DEMETER satellite[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2020, 8: 572393. doi: 10.3389/feart.2020.572393
    [32]
    HUANG J P, LEI J G, LI S X, et al. The electric field detector (EFD) onboard the ZH-1 satellite and first observational results[J]. Earth and Planetary Physics, 2018, 2(6): 469-478. doi: 10.26464/epp2018045
    [33]
    KAPLAN J O, LAU K H K. The WGLC global gridded lightning climatology and time series[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13(7): 3219-3237. doi: 10.5194/essd-13-3219-2021
    [34]
    MERMELSTEIN P. Distance measures for speech recognition, psychological and instrumental[M]//CHEN C H. Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence. New York: Academic Press, 1976: 374-388
    [35]
    ZHOU D Q, HOU Q B, CHEN Y P, et al. Rethinking bottleneck structure for efficient mobile network design[C]//Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Computer Vision. Glasgow: Springer, 2020: 680-697. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58580-8_40
    [36]
    HE K M, GKIOXARI G, DOLLÁR P, et al. Mask R-CNN[C]//Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Venice: IEEE, 2017: 2980-2988
    [37]
    HUANG Z J, HUANG L C, GONG Y C, et al. Mask scoring R-CNN[C]//Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Long Beach: IEEE, 2019: 6402-6411
    [38]
    赵庶凡, 廖力, 张学民. 地面VLF波穿透电离层的能量衰减变化[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60(8): 3004-3014 doi: 10.6038/cjg20170809

    ZHAO Shufan, LIAO Li, ZHANG Xuemin. Trans-ionospheric VLF wave power absorption of terrestrial VLF signal[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017, 60(8): 3004-3014 doi: 10.6038/cjg20170809
    [39]
    BALAN N, LIU L B, LE H J. A brief review of equatorial ionization anomaly and ionospheric irregularities[J]. Earth and Planetary Physics, 2018, 2(4): 257-275. doi: 10.26464/epp2018025
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(206) PDF Downloads(17) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return