Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YU Miaomiao, ZHU Di, DONG Xiaolong, ZHANG Jingyu. Doppler Spectrum Analysis and Centroid Estimation of Ka-band Spaceborne Sea Surface Scatter Echoes (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(3): 1-11 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0072
Citation: YU Miaomiao, ZHU Di, DONG Xiaolong, ZHANG Jingyu. Doppler Spectrum Analysis and Centroid Estimation of Ka-band Spaceborne Sea Surface Scatter Echoes (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(3): 1-11 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0072

Doppler Spectrum Analysis and Centroid Estimation of Ka-band Spaceborne Sea Surface Scatter Echoes

doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0072 cstr: 32142.14.cjss.2025-0072
  • Received Date: 2025-04-30
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-07-04
  • Available Online: 2025-07-04
  • The ocean surface dynamic parameters reflect important air-sea interaction processes, such as the material and energy balance, and climate change. Under spaceborne measurement conditions, it is necessary to study the echo Doppler spectrum characteristics formed by the high operating speed of the satellite in conjunction with the sea surface dynamic parameters. In this paper, a time-varying dynamic sea surface model is established via the existing linear random superposition theory to simulate ocean surfaces. Based on the satellite parameters defined by the Ocean Surface Current multiscale Observation Mission (OSCOM), this work derives echo Doppler spectra involving different wind parameter effects under medium-incidence-angle Bragg scattering conditions. As wind speed increases, the sea surface roughness and root mean square height increase accordingly, resulting in the stronger backscatter modulation, and the echo Doppler shift increases significantly. When observed along the track, the echo Doppler centroid of the Doppler spectrum with wind direction is slightly asymmetric at the downwind and upwind, and reaches a minimum at a 90° wind direction. The analysis results of the wind fetch show that when the wind speed is 10 m·s–1 and the length of wind fetch increases from a-10 km-developing wave to a fully-developed wave, the velocity of the sea surface increases, and the tilt modulation of the long wave increases, resulting in the Doppler shift increases, and the estimated Doppler centroid difference is 0.56 m·s–1. Finally, this study considers the contribution of breaking waves to the co-polarized backscatter and analyzes the influence of both the Doppler centroid and velocity estimation. Analysis of echo Doppler spectrum under the condition of wave breaking shows that when the wind speed is 10 m·s–1 and the observation azimuth is the same as the wind direction, the Doppler centroid offset is about 71.4 Hz, resulting in a deviation of about 0.3 m·s–1 for the radial velocity estimation compared with the case without considering the breaking wave.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    KLEIN P, LAPEYRE G, SIEGELMAN L, et al. Ocean-scale interactions from space[J]. Earth and Space Science, 2019, 6(5): 795-817. doi: 10.1029/2018EA000492
    [2]
    D’ASARO E, LEE C, RAINVILLE L, et al. Enhanced turbulence and energy dissipation at ocean fronts[J]. Science, 2011, 332(6027): 318-322. doi: 10.1126/science.1201515
    [3]
    ARDHUIN F, AKSENOV Y, BENETAZZO A, et al. Measuring currents, ice drift, and waves from space: the Sea surface KInematics Multiscale monitoring (SKIM) concept[J]. Ocean Science, 2018, 14: 337-354. doi: 10.5194/os-14-337-2018
    [4]
    DU Y, DONG X L, JIANG X W, et al. Ocean Surface Current multiscale Observation Mission (OSCOM): simultaneous measurement of ocean surface current, vector wind, and temperature[J]. Progress in Oceanography, 2021, 193: 102531. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102531
    [5]
    RODRÍGUEZ E, BOURASSA M, CHELTON D, et al. The winds and currents mission concept[J]. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2019, 6: 438 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00438
    [6]
    GOMMENGINGER C, CHAPRON B, HOGG A, et al. SEASTAR: a mission to study ocean submesoscale dynamics and small-scale atmosphere-ocean processes in coastal, shelf and polar seas[J]. Frontiers in Marine Science, 2019, 6: 457. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00457
    [7]
    LÓPEZ-DEKKER P, BIGGS J, CHAPRON B, et al. The harmony mission: end of phase-0 science overview[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS. Brussels: IEEE, 2021: 7752-7755
    [8]
    BAO Q L, DONG X L, ZHU D, et al. The feasibility of ocean surface current measurement using pencil-beam rotating scatterometer[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2015, 8(7): 3441-3451 doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2414451
    [9]
    MIAO Y J, DONG X L, BAO Q L, et al. Perspective of a Ku-Ka dual-frequency scatterometer for simultaneous wide-swath ocean surface wind and current measurement[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(7): 1042 doi: 10.3390/rs10071042
    [10]
    ZHANG J Y, DONG X L, ZHU D, et al. Airborne validation experiments for spaceborne doppler scatterometers and the joint observation of wind and currents[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS. Brussels: IEEE, 2021: 3209-3212
    [11]
    THOMPSON D R. Calculation of microwave doppler spectra from the ocean surface with a time-dependent composite model[M]//KOMEN G J, OOST W A. Radar Scattering from Modulated Wind Waves. Dordrecht: Springer, 1989: 27-40
    [12]
    RYABKOVA M, KARAEV V, GUO J, et al. A review of wave spectrum models as applied to the problem of radar probing of the sea surface[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2019, 124(10): 7104-7134. doi: 10.1029/2018JC014804
    [13]
    KADOTA T, LABIANCA F. A mathematical representation of random gravity waves in the ocean[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1980, 5(4): 215-224. doi: 10.1109/JOE.1980.1145472
    [14]
    TALLEY L D, PICKARD G L, EMERY W J, et al. Chapter 8 - gravity waves, tides, and coastal oceanography[M]//TALLEY L D, PICKARD G L, EMERY W, et al. Descriptive Physical Oceanography. 6th ed. Boston: Academic Press, 2011: 223-244
    [15]
    YUROVSKY Y Y, KUDRYAVTSEV V N, GRODSKY S A, et al. Ka-Band dual copolarized empirical model for the sea surface radar cross section[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(3): 1629-1647. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2628640
    [16]
    VALENZUELA G R. Theories for the interaction of electromagnetic and oceanic waves — a review[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1978, 13(1): 61-85. doi: 10.1007/BF00913863
    [17]
    ZHANG J Y, DONG X L, ZHU D. Analysis of Doppler spectrum of a spaceborne Doppler scatterometer using an echoed signal simulation model[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2023, 44(16): 4883-4910. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2023.2240510
    [18]
    FUKAO S, HAMAZU K. Radar measurements and scatterer parameters[M]//FUKAO S, HAMAZU K. Radar for Meteorological and Atmospheric Observations. Tokyo: Springer, 2014: 33-73
    [19]
    BARRICK D. First-order theory and analysis of MF/HF/VHF scatter from the sea[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 1972, 20(1): 2-10,10. doi: 10.1109/TAP.1972.1140123
    [20]
    YUROVSKY Y Y, KUDRYAVTSEV V N, GRODSKY S A, et al. On Doppler shifts of breaking waves[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(7): 1824. doi: 10.3390/rs15071824
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(14)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(690) PDF Downloads(103) Cited by()
    Visiting Statistics
    Related Articles

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return