Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SHEN Xinhua, WANG Jin, LAN Ding, ZHAI Sihan, CHEN Hao. Simulation of Bubble Behavior and Energy Efficiency in Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers based on Fluid Phase Field under Microgravity Conditions (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(3): 1-10 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0153
Citation: SHEN Xinhua, WANG Jin, LAN Ding, ZHAI Sihan, CHEN Hao. Simulation of Bubble Behavior and Energy Efficiency in Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers based on Fluid Phase Field under Microgravity Conditions (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(3): 1-10 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0153

Simulation of Bubble Behavior and Energy Efficiency in Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers based on Fluid Phase Field under Microgravity Conditions

doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0153 cstr: 32142.14.cjss.2025-0153
  • Received Date: 2025-09-01
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-11-27
  • Available Online: 2026-03-12
  • Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers (PEMELs) constitute a promising, clean, and renewable technology for hydrogen production and represent a critical component of life-support and environmental control systems aboard space stations. At present, PEMEL operation in space environments exhibits reductions in energy-conversion efficiency attributable to complex bubble dynamics within the cell; accordingly, a systematic investigation of intradevice bubble behavior is essential for optimizing overall system performance. In this study, we develop a multiphysics modeling framework that couples a detailed electrochemical model with a fluid phase-field model to perform a comparative analysis of how fundamental operating and geometric parameters — specifically inlet water velocity, outlet pressure, and channel depth — affect bubble dynamics in PEMELs under both normal-gravity and microgravity conditions, and to quantify the consequent effects on energy efficiency; the coupled model is validated through quantitative comparison with data from high-quality published literature. The simulation results indicate that, under both gravity regimes, increasing the inlet water velocity from 0.1 m·s–1 to 0.5 m·s–1 drives a transition of flow regime from wavy flow to dispersed bubble flow, yielding higher bubble coverage and a concomitant decrease in energy efficiency, and therefore high inlet water velocities (e.g., 0.5 m·s–1) should be avoided. As the outlet pressure increases from 1 atm to 10 atm, the bubble regime progressively shifts from dispersed bubble flow toward wavy or thin-film flow, which increases bubble coverage and degrades energy efficiency; accordingly, high outlet pressures (e.g., 10 atm) should be avoided. Increasing channel depth from 0.8 mm to 1.2 mm promotes a transition from wavy flow to dispersed bubble flow, reduces lower-wall bubble coverage, and improves energy efficiency, suggesting an optimal channel depth range of approximately 1.0~1.2 mm. Variations in gravity direction exert only minor influence on bubble behavior and energy efficiency for millimeter-scale flow fields. These findings provide valuable guidance for bubble-management strategies and for the design and operation of PEMELs to enhance energy-conversion efficiency in both terrestrial and microgravity environments.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    FENG Q, YUAN X Z, LIU G Y, et al. A review of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis on degradation mechanisms and mitigation strategies[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 366: 33-55 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.006
    [2]
    ZOU J X, HAN N, YAN J Y, et al. Electrochemical compression technologies for high-pressure hydrogen: current status, challenges and perspective[J]. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 2020, 3(4): 690-729 doi: 10.1007/s41918-020-00077-0
    [3]
    LEE C, HINEBAUGH J, BANERJEE R, et al. Influence of limiting throat and flow regime on oxygen bubble saturation of polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer porous transport layers[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(5): 2724-2735 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.114
    [4]
    LIU R T, XU Z L, LI F M, et al. Recent advances in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis[J]. Chemical Society Reviews, 2023, 52(16): 5652-5683 doi: 10.1039/D2CS00681B
    [5]
    MURUGAIAH D K, SHAHGALDI S. Recent progress in understanding the dispersion stability of catalyst ink for proton exchange membrane fuel cell and water electrolyzer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 66: 156-169 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.036
    [6]
    ZHOU T T, WANG C, CHENG X Z, et al. Two-phase flow characteristics on porous layer in PEM electrolyzer under different flow channel layouts[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 80: 249-260 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.378
    [7]
    SU X, XU L J, ZHU D, et al. Electrochemical performance study of proton exchange membrane electrolyzer considering the effect of bubble coverage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(70): 27079-27094 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.247
    [8]
    JEON D H, KIM S, KIM M, et al. Oxygen bubble transport in a porous transport layer of polymer electrolyte water electrolyzer[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2023, 553: 232322 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232322
    [9]
    NOURI-KHORASANI A, TABU OJONG E, SMOLINKA T, et al. Model of oxygen bubbles and performance impact in the porous transport layer of PEM water electrolysis cells[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(48): 28665-28680 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.167
    [10]
    HOSEINI LARIMI S Z, RAMIAR A, ESMAILI Q, et al. The effect of inlet velocity of water on the two-phase flow regime in the porous transport layer of polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer[J]. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 55(7): 1863-1870 doi: 10.1007/s00231-018-2436-x
    [11]
    QIU Y, ZHANG R M, LIU C, et al. Numerical investigation on two-phase flow of PEM water electrolyzers under high operating pressures[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 105: 817-834 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.331
    [12]
    朱凤, 焦飞飞, 王飞, 等. 微重力环境电解制氧系统临界运行条件与供水优化研究[J]. 中国空间科学技术(中英文), 2025, 45(2): 42-50

    ZHU Feng, JIAO Feifei, WANG Fei, et al. Critical operating conditions and water supply optimization of electrolytic oxygen generation system under microgravity environment[J]. Chinese Space Science and Technology, 2025, 45(2): 42-50
    [13]
    GARCÍA-SALABERRI P A. 1D two-phase, non-isothermal modeling of a proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer: an optimization perspective[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2022, 521: 230915 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230915
    [14]
    WU L Z, ZHANG G B, XIE B, et al. Integration of the detailed channel two-phase flow into three-dimensional multi-phase simulation of proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cell[J]. International Journal of Green Energy, 2021, 18(6): 541-555 doi: 10.1080/15435075.2020.1854270
    [15]
    ZHOU H R, MENG K, CHEN W S, et al. 3D two‐phase and non‐isothermal modeling for PEM water electrolyzer: heat and mass transfer characteristic investigation[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2022, 46(12): 17126-17143 doi: 10.1002/er.8375
    [16]
    ZHANG Z Q, XING X H. Simulation and experiment of heat and mass transfer in a proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(39): 20184-20193 doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.102
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(13)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(505) PDF Downloads(92) Cited by()
    Visiting Statistics
    Related Articles

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return