Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHOU Jianghua, CHENG Junfei, CAI Rong, LIU Jifeng, YANG Yanchu, GAN Qingbo, YAN Daikang, HUANG Wanning, LI Yijian, LU Ying, CUI Yuxuan. Balloon-borne Astronomical Observations in Antarctica (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(3): 1-23 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0191
Citation: ZHOU Jianghua, CHENG Junfei, CAI Rong, LIU Jifeng, YANG Yanchu, GAN Qingbo, YAN Daikang, HUANG Wanning, LI Yijian, LU Ying, CUI Yuxuan. Balloon-borne Astronomical Observations in Antarctica (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(3): 1-23 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0191

Balloon-borne Astronomical Observations in Antarctica

doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0191 cstr: 32142.14.cjss.2025-0191
  • Received Date: 2025-11-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-03-02
  • Available Online: 2026-03-12
  • Antarctica is widely regarded as one of the most favorable natural laboratories for astronomy, owing to its exceptionally low atmospheric water vapor and correspondingly high transmittance across multiple wavebands. Beyond these radiative advantages, the Antarctic summer provides a unique operational regime for stratospheric scientific balloons: continuous daylight and a relatively stable polar vortex support long-duration, near-constant-float-altitude flights with circumpolar trajectories. These conditions enable balloon platforms to deliver space-like observing environments at substantially lower cost, with the added benefits of rapid iteration, recoverable payloads, and flexible mission design. Since 1984, the U.S. Antarctic balloon program - launched primarily from McMurdo Station - has carried out hundreds of balloon-borne experiments, with astronomical and astrophysical missions forming a major fraction of the overall portfolio. The resulting body of work spans two broad domains: particle astrophysics and electromagnetic (photon) astronomy. Representative themes include measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), terahertz observations and broadband spectral imaging of Galactic targets, and particle-oriented investigations such as neutrino-related observations and searches for antimatter components. Together, these missions have helped advance frontier science while simultaneously maturing key enabling technologies for near-space instrumentation, including long-duration platform operations, pointing and stabilization, low-noise detector readout, cryogenic subsystems, background suppression strategies, and robust telemetry, recovery, and reflight capability. Building on publicly available literature and mission records, this paper provides a systematic review of Antarctic balloon-borne astronomical experiments, organizing prior efforts by observing band, scientific objective, and payload and instrument class. By synthesizing the scientific drivers and the evolution of mission concepts, the review also highlights how Antarctic ballooning serves as a practical bridge between ground-based facilities and space missions-de-risking high-impact hardware and observation strategies in a repeatable, lower-cost environment.Finally, we discuss prospects for developing China’s Antarctic balloon infrastructure. Establishing a dedicated polar balloon capability and conducting long-duration circumpolar balloon astronomy campaigns would strengthen China’s competitiveness in near-space astrophysics, accelerate technology readiness through iterative fielding, and enhance China’s scientific visibility and influence in Antarctic research.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    蔡榕, 孙建颖. 浮空飞行器极地科学探测[J]. 现代物理知识, 2020, 32(2): 18-25

    CAI Rong, SUN Jianying. Polar scientific exploration by airships[J]. Modern Physics Knowledge, 2020, 32(2): 18-25
    [2]
    李一健, 黄宛宁, 周江华, 等. 临近空间天文台发展现状与展望[J]. 空间科学学报, 2024, 44(6): 1068-108

    LI Yijian, HUANG Wanning, ZHOU Jianghua, et al. Development status and prospects of near space observatories[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2024, 44(6): 1068-108
    [3]
    顾逸东. 气球科学观测100年[J]. 现代物理知识, 2020, 32(2): 3-12

    GU Yidong. 100 years of balloon scientific observations[J]. Modern Physics Knowledge, 2020, 32(2): 3-12
    [4]
    SOLANKI S K, RIETHMÜLLER T L, BARTHOL P, et al. The second flight of the SUNRISE balloon-borne solar observatory: overview of instrument updates, the flight, the data, and first results[J]. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2017, 229(1): 2
    [5]
    LOCKOWANDT C, ABRAHAMSSON M. The stratospheric balloon mission PoGO+ from Esrange to Victoria Island, Canada[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Balloon Systems Conference. Denver: AIAA, 2017
    [6]
    田莉莉, 方贤德. NASA高空气球的研究及其进展[J]. 航天返回与遥感, 2012, 33(1): 81-87 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8518.2012.01.019

    TIAN Lili, FANG Xiande. Research and progress of NASA’s balloon[J]. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 2012, 33(1): 81-87 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8518.2012.01.019
    [7]
    JONES W V. Scientific ballooning: past, present and future[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2013, 1516(1): 229-233 doi: 10.1063/1.4792574
    [8]
    WALKER C, KULESA C, YOUNG A, et al. Gal/Xgal U/LDB spectroscopic/stratospheric THz observatory: GUSTO[C]//Proceedings of SPIE 12190, Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XI. Montréal: SPIE, 2022: 121900E
    [9]
    HOOVER S, for the ANITA collaboration. Status of the ANITA experiment[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2007, 81(1): 012009
    [10]
    李惕碚, 顾逸东. 我国的高空科学气球与高能天文观测[J]. 自然杂志, 1984, 7(3): 163-169

    LI Tibei, GU Yidong. China's High-altitude Scientific Balloons and High-energy Astronomical Observations[J]. Chinese Journal of Nature, 1984, 7(3): 163-169
    [11]
    林隽, 宋腾飞, 孙明哲, 等. 50 mm白光球载日冕仪: Ⅰ. 基本结构与地面观测实验[J]. 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学, 2023, 53(5): 259611

    LIN Jie, SONG Tengfei, SUN Mingzhe, et al. A 50-mm balloon-borne white-light coronagraph: I. Basic structure and experiments on the ground[J]. SCIENTIA SINICA Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2023, 53(5): 259611
    [12]
    苏润, 李小建. 平流层零压气球飞行控制仿真研究[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 41(3): 325-332

    SU Run, LI Xiaojian. Numerical simulation study on flight performance of stratospheric zero-pressure balloon[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology, 2018, 41(3): 325-332
    [13]
    隋翠娟, 孙兰涛, 孟上, 等. 2003年北极科考期间一次极涡个例天气学分析[J]. 海洋学报, 2010, 32(4): 51-61

    SUI Cuijuan, SUN Lantao, MENG Shang, et al. Case analysis of the polar vortex during Arctic research expedition in 2003[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2010, 32(4): 51-61
    [14]
    龙远, 邓小龙, 杨希祥, 等. 极涡风场中平流层浮空器轨迹仿真研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2021, 38(8): 37-42

    LONG Yuan, DENG Xiaolong, YANG Xixiang, et al. Trajectory simulation of stratosphere aerostats in polar vortex wind field[J]. Computer Simulation, 2021, 38(8): 37-42
    [15]
    蔡榕, 孙建颖. 我国高空气球极地科学探测的初步构想[J]. 科学通报, 2020, 65(32): 3510-3519

    CAI Rong, SUN Jianying. Advances in Chinese polar scientific exploration using high-altitude balloons[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2020, 65(32): 3510-3519
    [16]
    KOGUT A, FIXSEN D, FIXSEN S, et al. ARCADE: absolute radiometer for cosmology, astrophysics, and diffuse emission[J]. New Astronomy Reviews, 2006, 50(11/12): 925-931
    [17]
    LANGE A, DE BERNARDIS P, DE PETRIS M, et al. The BOOMERANG experiment[J]. Space Science Reviews, 1995, 74(1): 145-150
    [18]
    CRILL B P, ADE P A R, ARTUSA D R, et al. BOOMERANG: a balloon-borne millimeter-wave telescope and total power receiver for mapping anisotropy in the cosmic microwave background[J]. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 2003, 148(2): 527
    [19]
    REICHBORN-KJENNERUD B, ABOOBAKER A M, ADE P, et al. EBEX: a balloon-borne CMB polarization experiment[C]//Proceedings of SPIE 7741, Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy V. San Diego: SPIE, 2010: 77411C
    [20]
    FILIPPINI J P, ADE P A R, AMIRI M, et al. SPIDER: a balloon-borne CMB polarimeter for large angular scales[C]//Proceedings of SPIE 7741, Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy V. San Diego: SPIE, 2010: 77411N
    [21]
    SHAW E C, ADE P A R, AKERS S, et al. In-flight performance of SPIDER’s 280-GHz receivers[J]. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 2024, 10(4): 044012
    [22]
    RIZZO M J, RINEHART S A, DHABAL A, et al. The balloon experimental twin telescope for infrared interferometry (BETTII): towards the first flight[C]//Proceedings of SPIE 9908, Ground-Based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI. Edinburgh: SPIE, 2016: 99080S
    [23]
    RHODES J, DOBKE B, BOOTH J, et al. Space-quality data from balloon-borne telescopes: the High Altitude Lensing Observatory (HALO)[J]. Astroparticle Physics, 2012, 38: 31-40
    [24]
    RESTER A C. The GRAD Supernova Observer: first flight of a very large balloon over Antarctica[J]. Advances in Space Research, 1993, 13(2): 87-99
    [25]
    BOGGS S E, LIN R P, FEFFER P T, et al. A high resolution gamma-ray and hard X-ray spectrometer (HIREGS) for long duration balloon flights[J]. Advances in Space Research, 1998, 21(7): 1015-1018
    [26]
    FEFFER P T, LIN R P, SMITH D M, et al. Preliminary results from the HIgh REsolution gamma-ray and hard X-ray spectrometer (HIREGS) long duration balloon flight in Antarctica[J]. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 1993, 97: 31-33
    [27]
    ABARR Q, BEHESHTIPOUR B, BEILICKE M, et al. Performance of the X-Calibur hard X-ray polarimetry mission during its 2018/19 long-duration balloon flight[J]. Astroparticle Physics, 2022, 143: 102749
    [28]
    ABARR Q, AWAKI H, BARING M G, et al. XL-Calibur–a second-generation balloon-borne hard X-ray polarimetry mission[J]. Astroparticle Physics, 2021, 126: 102529
    [29]
    WALKER C, KULESA C, BERNASCONI P, et al. The stratospheric THz observatory (STO)[C]//Proceedings of SPIE 7733, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes III. San Diego: SPIE, 2010: 77330N
    [30]
    MILLS G, YOUNG A, DOMINGUEZ R, et al. Cryogenics on the stratospheric terahertz observatory (STO)[C]//Proceedings of the Cryogenic Engineering Conference. Tucson: CEC, 2015: 012131
    [31]
    PASCALE E, ADE P A R, BOCK J J, et al. The balloon-borne large aperture submillimeter telescope: BLAST[J]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2008, 681(1): 400-414
    [32]
    GALITZKI N, ADE P A R, ANGILÈ F E, et al. The next generation BLAST experiment[J]. Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 2014, 3(2): 1440001
    [33]
    TUCKER G S, NAGLER P, BUTLER N, et al. The exoplanet climate infrared TElescope (EXCITE)[C]//Proceedings of SPIE 10702, Ground-Based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII. Austin: SPIE, 2018: 107025G
    [34]
    BRYDEN G, TRAUB W, ROBERTS JR L C, et al. Zodiac II: debris disk science from a balloon[C]//Proceedings of SPIE 8151, Techniques and Instrumentation for Detection of Exoplanets V. San Diego: SPIE, 2011: 81511E
    [35]
    GUZIK T G. The advanced thin ionization calorimeter (ATIC) for studies of high energy cosmic rays[C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Cosmic Ray Conference. Salt Lake City: ICRC, 1999: 09
    [36]
    WEFEL J P. The ATIC experiment: first balloon flight[C]//Proceedings of the 27th International Cosmic Ray Conference. Hamburg, Germany: ICRC, 2001: 2111
    [37]
    WAKELY S P, AHN H S, ALLISON P, et al. First measurements of cosmic-ray nuclei at high energy with CREAM[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2008, 42(3): 403-408
    [38]
    MAESTRO P, AHN H S, ALLISON P, et al. Measurements of cosmic-ray energy spectra with the 2nd CREAM flight[J]. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements, 2009, 196: 239-242
    [39]
    YOON Y S, ANDERSON T, BARRAU A, et al. Proton and helium spectra from the CREAM-III flight[J]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2017, 839(1): 5
    [40]
    ANDERSON T B. Exploring the cosmic ray spectrum with the CREAM experiment[D]. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University, 2013
    [41]
    RAUCH B F. Measurement of the relative abundances of the ultra-heavy galactic cosmic rays (30≤ Z≤ 40) with the Trans-Iron Galactic Element Recorder (TIGER) instrument[D]. Seattle: Washington University, 2008
    [42]
    BINNS W R, BOSE R G, BRAUN D L, et al. The SuperTIGER instrument: measurement of elemental abundances of ultra-heavy galactic cosmic rays[J]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2014, 788(1): 18
    [43]
    GORHAM P W, ALLISON P, BANERJEE O, et al. Constraints on the diffuse high-energy neutrino flux from the third flight of ANITA[J]. Physical Review D, 2018, 98(2): 022001
    [44]
    PROHIRA S, NOVIKOV A, BESSON D Z, et al. HiCal 2: an instrument designed for calibration of the ANITA experiment and for Antarctic surface reflectivity measurements[J]. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2019, 918: 60-66
    [45]
    YAMAMOTO A, MITCHELL J W. Search for primary antiparticles and cosmological antimatter with BESS[J]. Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements, 2013, 243-244: 92-97
    [46]
    ABE K, FUKE H, HAINO S, et al. Measurements of cosmic-ray proton and helium spectra from the BESS-Polar long-duration balloon flights over Antarctica[J]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2016, 822(2): 65
    [47]
    ONG R A, ARAMAKI T, BIRD R, et al. The GAPS experiment to search for dark matter using low-energy antimatter[C]//Proceedings of the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference. Busan: ICRC, 2017
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(31)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(360) PDF Downloads(76) Cited by()
    Visiting Statistics
    Related Articles

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return